Forum   Contacts   RSS
AtomInfo.Ru


US Policy Toward Iran Remains Unchanged, Tied to Israel, Saudi Arabia

RIA Novosti, PUBLISHED 17.05.2014

Negotiations between Iran and the so-called P5+1 group have not fundamentally changed Washington’s policy towards Tehran, which remains tied to US allies Israel and Saudi Arabia, investigative historian and journalist Gareth Porter told RIA Novosti on Friday.

“Despite these negotiations, the fundamentals of US policy toward Iran have not changed,” said Porter, an expert on US national security policy.

“The interests that have determined US policy toward Iran for decades – accommodating the interests of Israel and Saudi Arabia and the usefulness of having Iran as an adversary in justifying military deployments, missile defense programs and large-scale arms sales to the Gulf – remain in place,” he added.

The talks in Vienna between Iran on one side and Russia, China, France, the US and the EU plus Germany on the other are running into serious difficulties as the sides are trying to pass on to a practical stage to elaborate a draft of a comprehensive agreement on Iran’s nuclear program.

“The problem in this crucial stage of beginning the actual drafting of the agreement is that the United States is taking a position on the enrichment capabilities Iran would be allowed that is completely unacceptable to Iran,” Porter told RIA Novosti. “It is demanding that it be limited to a small fraction of what it now has on the basis of a ‘breakout’ scenario that is quite implausible.”

At the same time, worries about slow progress could be over exaggerated, and Anoush Ehteshami, a professor of International Relations at Durham University said that in the context of the negotiations that started in 2003 and yielded no results for a decade, the recent progress has been remarkable.

Last November, Iran and the P5+1 agreed in Geneva on the temporary limiting of Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for a partial halt of US and EU sanctions against Iran.

“Now they start with the final stage measures. So progress has been remarkable and the conservatives in both Tehran and Washington managed to keep quiet and let this process proceed between diplomats,” Ehteshami told RIA Novosti.

At the same time, he noted that both Washington and Tehran have a common goal “of persuading their own domestic constituencies that what they are doing is good for their countries.”

“Iran wants to persuade its conservatives that it is not abandoning its nuclear program and Obama has to persuade the Congress that what he is doing in the negotiations is that he is making sure Iran doesn’t become a nuclear state. They both understand what needs to happen and to be done,” Ehteshami said.

In the US, Congress is skeptical about Iran’s program, and the sides also need to discuss the issues of regional security. But neither Israel – Washington’s main ally in the region – nor Saudi Arabia is ready for such an eventuality.

“Washington would like a deal that it can sell easily to a Congress dominated by pro-Israel interests. But it now appears to be unready to agree to a comprehensive agreement that would be attacked by those interests,” Gareth Porter said.

The P5+1 and Iran have already held five rounds of talks, and a complete agreement guaranteeing the absence of military components in Iran’s nuclear program is scheduled to be finalized by July 20.

Topics: USA, Iran


Other news:

Hungary Enacts Law to Expand Nuclear Power With Russian Aid

Hungary’s president has signed a bill into law to expand a nuclear power plant in the country with Russian assistance.

Hungary Lawmakers OK Russia Nuclear Plant Deal

Russia will provide Hungary a loan of up to 10 billion euros ($13.5 billion) - around 80 percent of construction costs.

Russia to Lend Hungary $13.7Bln for Nuclear Plant

The deal was announced during a state visit to Moscow by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and was hailed by Russian President Vladimir Putin.


Hero of the day

Jerry Hopwood

Questions for Jerry Hopwood

We are currently working with the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) on this approach, which was submitted in response to their February 2012 call for alternative proposals. We appreciate that the UK is in the early stages of their policy development activities and are pleased to be involved in such important work.



INTERVIEW

Yanko Yanev

Yanko Yanev
Unfortunately, we live in this age of narrow political thinking. Each of our politicians think how to survive, whether he will be the next convocation of the parliament or the government or not.


OPINION

Joint Plan of Action

Joint Plan of Action
The goal for these negotiations is to reach a mutually-agreed long-term comprehensive solution that would ensure Iran's nuclear programme will be exclusively peaceful. Iran reaffirms that under no circumstances will Iran ever seek or develop any nuclear weapons.


Search:


Rambler's Top100