Claims by British company EDF Energy that cracks inside one of reactor cores at Hunterston B in a Scottish county were safe, are "overly reassuring" and the reasons for the cracking and any associated risk remain unknown, one of the world's leading nuclear safety experts told RIA Novosti on Tuesday.
With a career spanning five decades, including leading the nuclear risk assessment team during the raising of the damaged Russian nuclear submarine Kursk in 2001, John Large told RIA Novosti, "I disagree with the somewhat overly reassuring opinions of [EDF Energy] and I note that this cracking has to be taken into account with a number of other graphite degradation processes and outcomes, particularly the graphite mass loss via radiolysis."
In a statement EDF Energy's Director of Nuclear Operations, Brian Cowell said, "What we have found here is that our models and mathematical assumptions are absolutely underpinned by our findings. Therefore, they have revalidated again the fact that we have got these massive safety margins and the (reactor) cores will behave as we have predicted in extreme events, which is exactly what we want."
The dual-use nature of nuclear technology consisting in the potential for its application equally in peaceful and military sphere is the basic contradiction for the existing nuclear nonproliferation regime and comprehensive development of the nuclear power and nuclear fuel cycle.
Jerry Hopwood
We are currently working with the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) on this approach, which was submitted in response to their February 2012 call for alternative proposals. We appreciate that the UK is in the early stages of their policy development activities and are pleased to be involved in such important work.
Joint Plan of Action
The goal for these negotiations is to reach a mutually-agreed long-term comprehensive solution that would ensure Iran's nuclear programme will be exclusively peaceful. Iran reaffirms that under no circumstances will Iran ever seek or develop any nuclear weapons.