Forum   Contacts   RSS
AtomInfo.Ru


IAEA Divided on Atomic Risks From Potential US Airstrike in Syria

RIA Novosti, PUBLISHED September 12, 2013

The head of the United Nations’ nuclear energy watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said Monday that his agency was divided about nuclear risks from a potential US airstrike in Syria.

Yukiya Amano said that US and Cuban representatives disagreed about such risks, but their exact opinions could not be revealed because they spoke at a private meeting of the agency’s board of governors.

He said his agency would be unable to fulfill Russia’s request for such an assessment within the week.

It is a very “complicated issue” that “takes time,” he said, adding that it was important for the agency to listen to the opinions of other member states, so he was unable to tell “our Russian friends” when a reply would be provided.

Vladimir Voronkov, Russia’s permanent envoy to international agencies in Vienna, said Monday that he expected a reply to the request by the end of the week.

“We stressed that it is an urgent matter and called on the IAEA general director and the agency to act without delay,” Voronkov said. The board of governors’ meeting is expected to last through Friday.

On Thursday, the Russian Foreign Ministry urged the IAEA secretariat to evaluate nuclear risks of a US strike on the miniature neutron source reactor near Damascus and other nuclear facilities in Syria.

Western intervention in Syria could jeopardize the region’s nuclear security, the ministry said in a statement, adding that any damage caused to a neutron reactor near Damascus would have disastrous consequences.

The US Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted on Wednesday to give President Barack Obama the authority to use military force against the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad in response to an alleged chemical weapons attack last month.

A US intelligence report claims that the Assad regime was behind a chemical weapons attack near Damascus on August 21 that Washington says left more than a thousand civilians dead.

The UN Security Council has so far not authorized any military intervention in the Syrian crisis. Russia has urged all sides in the conflict to use diplomatic means to resolve it.

Topics: IAEA


Other news:

Rosatom Inks Deals, Edges Closer to UK Nuclear Reactor Market

Rosatom signed a memorandum on collaboration in nuclear energy.

Russia Questions IAEA on Syrian Nuclear Risks

Russia has handed over an official request.

China Offers Russia Floating Nuke Plant Joint Project

It was proposed that a joint venture should be established with investments from both sides.


Hero of the day

Jacques Repussard

Jacques Repussard: knowledge, independence, proximity

They told me: "Mr Repussard, we're not used to responding to anti-nuclear organisations". To which I replied: "We will not reveal any state or trade secrets, but we will not leave them without any answer".



INTERVIEW

Georgy Toshinsky

Georgy Toshinsky
Not quite so. The authors of the concept, which was difficult to be realized in practice, turned to a clearer concept of a standing wave reactor (TP-1) that in principle allows finding the solution to the tasks stated for TWRs.


OPINION

Alexander Yakovenko

Alexander Yakovenko
The preparatory committee for the 2015 NPT review conference took place in Geneva on April 22-May 3. Russia views strengthening the NPT regime as a crucial task and considers it a foreign policy priority.


Search:


Rambler's Top100